Customer data separation
Can AI work for one customer without ever seeing another customer’s data?
- Each customer’s data walled off at every layer, including AI search
- Separate, revocable access for every AI integration
AI readiness assessment
In two to three weeks our experts review your data, systems, cloud and security. You get a readiness score, the risks ranked by business impact, and a costed 90-day roadmap to AI that works in production.
$ tke assess --scope platform --areas all
✓ scanned 14 repos · 3 pipelines · 2 subscriptions
Is this you?
What we assess
Each area is scored against evidence in your systems, not opinions in a workshop. Together they cover the whole journey from idea to AI running safely in front of customers.
Can AI work for one customer without ever seeing another customer’s data?
Is the information your AI relies on accurate, current and owned by someone?
Can AI take actions in your systems without being able to do damage?
Can you change an AI feature and prove it still works before customers see it?
Do you know what AI costs per customer and per feature, and whether it pays back?
Would your AI pass a security review, an audit and a regulator’s questions?
What we usually find
None of them show up in a pilot. All of them show up at scale, in an audit or on an invoice.
Fine when your own app is the only thing asking for data. Dangerous when an AI assistant writes the request.
Three versions of the refund policy across a wiki, a PDF and a help centre. The AI finds all three.
AI needs clear, limited actions it can preview and undo, not unrestricted access to your database.
Prompts and model settings edited by hand in a console, with no testing, history or way back.
The first big invoice arrives and nobody can say which customer or feature generated it.
Documents, emails and web pages fed to an AI with nothing stopping hidden instructions inside them.
What you receive
Formats
Leadership interviews and a high-level review of your data, systems and AI plans. A readiness score, top risks and priorities for the board.
Discuss this format →Everything in the executive assessment plus a hands-on review of your code, data, cloud and delivery process. Target architecture and costed 90-day roadmap.
Discuss this format →The full assessment, then we fix the critical blockers and take your first AI use case into production with you.
Discuss this format →Questions
Usually a technology leader, a business owner for the AI use cases, and someone from security or compliance. We run four to six short interviews and need read-only access to the relevant systems, or exported configuration if access is restricted. No production customer data is required.
No. Azure is where we go deepest, but the six areas apply to any cloud. We assess AWS, Google Cloud and on-premises estates on the same framework and call out where your platform changes the recommendation.
A readiness score for each of the six areas with the evidence behind it, a risk register ranked by business impact, a target architecture, a costed 90-day roadmap, and a plain-language summary for your leadership team. It is yours to act on with your own team, with us, or with another partner.
No, that is a common starting point. The assessment then focuses on hardening what is live (data separation, quality checks, cost tracking and security) before the next AI feature adds more risk.
A workshop produces ideas. The assessment produces evidence. We look at your actual data, systems and processes, and every finding is tied to something real and a concrete change that fixes it.
Tell us where you are with AI. A founder will reply within one working day with how we would scope your assessment.